1 Jan 2026

Decision Trees vs. Boosting: The One Expert vs. The Committee

Mateo Lafalce - Blog

When diving into machine learning, you will often choose between simplicity and raw power. Two of the most common concepts you’ll encounter are Decision Trees and Boosting. While they are related, they function very differently.

The Decision Tree: The solo expert thinks of a decision Tree as a single, specialized expert. You ask it a series of questions, and it follows a flowchart of rules to give you an answer.

• Pros: It is intuitive, easy to visualize, and fast :)
• Cons: If the tree is too complex, it memorizes the data rather than learning the general rules :(

Boosting: The Committee Boosting is not a single model; it’s a technique that builds a committee of many small Decision Trees. It works sequentially:

The first tree makes a prediction. The second tree looks at the errors of the first one and tries to fix them. The third tree fixes the errors of the second, and so on.

By combining hundreds of these simple weak learners, Boosting creates a highly accurate strong learner that often outperforms a single tree on complex data.

Which one to use? 

• If you need interpretability and speed for simple tasks, stick with a Decision Tree.
• If your goal is maximum accuracy on tabular data, stick with Boosting.

I have uploaded a complete Python example comparing the performance of a standard Decision Tree against a Gradient Boosting model using Scikit-Learn. Check out here.

This blog is open source. See an error? Go ahead and propose a change.